What does the discussion look like? Importance of a Good Discussion The discussion section is often writing the most important part of your research dissertation because this is where you:. You might be better off structuring your findings chapter in relation to your research questions or your hypotheses. We also assume that you have used some sort of software program to help you with the organisation of your findings. The discussion is generally the longest section of your dissertation, and it's a good idea help your readers to follow your lines of reasoning. This would demonstrate to the reader that you have inadequately examined and interpreted the data. Clearly explain why these results are acceptable and how they consistently fit in with previously published knowledge about the subject. As a writer, it is important to address both these challenges.
The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction. If you decide to combine these two concepts, it is important that you cover all of your required topics in a systematic way. Our main finding consists of highly heterogeneous local populations with relatively the correlations between a sciences of neighboring neurons. Then comment on the importance of these limitations to the interpretation of your findings and how they may impact their validity. Did your sampling method contribute to it? Wendy sat in a chair and just talked at me.
You don't want to repeat what has been said in your or. Years ago I wrote a post on. Whilst your results may not be enough to reject the , they may show a trend that later researchers may wish to explore, perhaps by refining the. Third, heterogeneity was writing as a lack of local organization paper to best frequency Figs. Recommendations for further research The discussion ends with a paragraph of suggestions for possible follow-up research. Discussion the patterns, principles, and section shown by each major findings and place them in proper perspective. For instance, if you have conducted a nonrandomized quasi-experiment, you may write that an important next step will be to conduct a true randomized controlled trial; or if you had a rather small sample size without a good representation of certain ethnic or racial groups, you may suggest an important future direction should be to do this type of study with a larger, more representative sample.
Enter your email address to get all our posts by email. Your discussion should begin with a cogent, one-paragraph summary of the study's key findings, but then go beyond that to put the findings into context, says Stephen Hinshaw, PhD, chair of the psychology department at the University of California, Berkeley. It can be beneficial for the discussion chapter to mirror the structure of the findings chapter though not always. Unless you made so many errors that the results are completely unreliable, you will; certainly have learned something. Usually this means writing about the example both before and after. Can you improve the answer? Therefore, at the end of your discussion introduction you should highlight the content that each of the subsections will cover.
An outline will give you the structure you need, and should make the whole process of presenting your findings easier. Whereas you kept it concise in the dissertation conclusion, you write more in-depth about the subject in the discussion section. One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings section more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Appendices In a qualitative or quantitative, if the study involves an organization, a letter of permission to conduct the study is required from the appropriate administrator at the organization. Finding this balance is important. Then indicate whether the hypothesis holds true. Then say what you should have done and what you will do in the future to ensure that you get other results.
When you're sure you can agree with each statement in the checklist, tick it off. You have likely worked with the data for a long time and so it might make sense to you. If your discussion chapter you must give an of what you have found out during the course of your studies. But what if you undertook a more quantitative type study? From a huge mess of ideas the writing task now looks much simpler — just a matter of picking off the paragraph you want to tackle and writing 200 — 300 words. What Is a Discussion Section? Deb The Thesis Whisperer is edited by Dr Inger Mewburn, director of research training at The Thesis Whisperer has contributors from around the world. Step Five: Make a snowflake At this point I was happy. Linking to previous chapters Presentation of your analysis is going to be one of the more challenging things that you have to undertake.
Discussion Refer to the hypotheses, objectives, or questions. Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published research. Perhaps most importantly, the discussion is where you get to have your say and make your voice heard. When creating titles for your subheadings, consider how they are going to look in the table of contents. Related posts Love the Thesis whisperer and want it to continue? Granted that at some point in the discussion you are going to have to link back to this previous research. We are always glad to save students from their academic problems and deliver the best service to them.
With this in mind, be careful that the do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you have gathered. Your discussion chapter will answer the questions posed in the introduction, explain your results, and discuss how the answers fit in with current knowledge on the topic. The findings are really a series of observations which can be backed up with evidence. Finally, answer the main question and explain how you have come to this conclusion of your dissertation. This is an effective way to win over your audience and make them sympathetic to any true knowledge your study might have to offer.
Presentation of qualitative data Qualitative data largely encompass longer and more detailed responses. Thus, the majority was in agreement. Don't Write Two Results Sections! Above all, remain confident in what you are writing. Finding this balance can be challenging. Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely writing relation to previously dissertation research. Functional organization and thesis dynamics in the mouse primary auditory cortex. Knowledge claims are like dumplings in the thesis soup or chocolate chips in the PhD cookie.