College student athletes are working hard anywhere between 30 to 40 hours a week to be successful and excellent. Why should a coach be getting paid more than any other tenured professor at a university, if it indeed is not a professional sport? Furthermore, athletes have been accused of making deals with gamblers and altering the outcome of games. Should college student athletes be paid for the services they offer during their years of study? This is why paying college. Capitalism This is where it gets a bit tricky. For example, no one pays a journalist when he sets up interviews at a college radio station. Only the schools and sponsors of these profiting tournaments and bowl games collect the profits that athletes bring in and it is not fair. These people feel that the promise of their education being paid for is enough for the college athletes.
The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. This stipend could help to cover expenses that are not covered in the scholarship. Instead they should be compensated. Should college athletes get paid to play? This topic obviously has two sides to it. College athletes should not be paid because of the fact that they are not employees. The rise in popularity of sports in the American society, coupled with its high profit margin for the colleges due to commercialization has led to creation of much revenue for the universities.
So, where is all that money going? According to research, more than half of student-athletes said they spend seven or more hours a week outside of scheduled practices, on their sport The Sport Digest 2002-2010 All student-athletes devote the same amount of time, how could it be fair to determine who gets paid and who gets cut? The stores are not able to use the player 's last name on anything that they sell. Why should the money go to the athletes? What about the hard earned money college athletes will never see and earned? The ongoing feud about colleges paying their athletes has not yet come to a rest. Both articles suggest and attack the notion if college athletes should be considered employees and be compensated for their work in play. They should take better care of their athletes by paying them for their services. College sports are no different from this.
Other students may envy them. The athletes do not garner In recent years, the issue of paying college athletes has come to the forefront. Due to the fact these players are in college, they should not be paid to play the sport they are gifted with. However, over the years, college athletics have changed for the worse, as players have been drifting further away, core reason being lack of funds for the players Eric, p. Smith, Stevin, and Don Yaeger. The athlete and their family cannot offer the money to get them through the hard times of making college payments. Why College Athletes Should Be Paid Essay Athletics in colleges is a growing multi-billion dollar industry which attracts more and more participants each year.
These organizations are raking in huge profits from merchandise sales, live events of media coverage. It is in order that they get paid for their participation because the situation that was prevailing a century ago is not the same now. There have also been contracts worth billions of dollars being signed between the universities and various. The revenue generated from college sports is a billon dollar industry, one that rewards coaches, staff members, and universities with ostentatious contracts, and gratuitous bonuses. College sporting events bring in money through tickets, jerseys, shirts, and other gear. If athletes were paid by the colleges, they might not as easily fall into illegal activities. The reasons why college athletes should be paid are significant.
High school and underclassmen are very eager to make the jump to the pros because of these reasons. This computation is modest because it does not even factor expenses such as travel and sundries… Works Cited Johnson, Dennis and Acquaviva, John. After doing some research, I noticed that when asked if. Being a college athlete is a full-time job and a big time commitment. Due to the fact that the college students face the same magnitude of risk injury as professional athletes, this makes the debate of being compensated more viable because scholarships alone are not able to cover this on their own.
But again college athletes are not allowed to hold a job during the school year. Many say that receiving a scholarship for their education is enough, and education is a great gift to the students. College coaches receive sky high salaries while the booster clubs donate millions of dollars to the university 's athletic program, but The college athletes of their respective sports today, have the opportunity of showcasing their talents in competition on local and national programming on a regular basis which has lately brought attention this controversy, paying college athletes. This is a false accusation. You have worked hard throughout your life to get to where you are today, a Division I college athlete. So, should Division One college… 3000 Words 12 Pages Should College Athletes be paid? If not to start to support them financially at least in small ways, there will not be future for college sport.
There are numerous ways that college athletes can be compensated for their time dedicated to the sport. A true athlete plays the game out of passion. One reason could be the ever increasing media coverage on each individual sport with certain channels devoted for just that particular sport, keeping viewers updated and thirsting to get out and play. Without the stipend, and unable to have jobs, the college athlete lives a life that only consists of schoolwork and athletic training, and they have to rely heavily on teammates for support. To many college athletes, it is a job, and they are willing to put in all the work necessary to be the best. For many athletes that is were it ends. There should be at least two citations in every body paragraph from at least two different sources.